Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency, Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency, West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency. : The constitutional validity of the Karnataka Act approving consequential seniority in promotions for the reserved category was upheld. Read morehttps://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/wife-blames-husband-for-forging-the-cheque/, 23- Delhi High Court allows the Cross examination though matter was at final arguments stage(11 October 2019), Delhi High Court has allowed the accused in a cheque bounce case to cross examine the complainant even though the matter was at the stage of final arguments. Read morehttps://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/blank-cheque/, 64-High Court : Accused cannot seek dropping of proceedings(27 July 2019), Calcutta High Court has upheld an order of Magistrate whereby he had rejected an application of accused asking for dropping of the proceedings in a cheque bounce case. Madras High Court has observed that Form 32 is sterling in nature and therefore that can be relied upon by the court at the time of dealing with quash petition. A district Court in Delhi has recently held that defence of the accused is not material at the time of passing order u/s 143A of NI Act for interim compensation to the complainant. In November, the Supreme Court in its historic judgment held that the CJI comes under the Right to Information Act and is a public authority under Section 2(h) of the Act. Collin. 47 landmark Supreme Court cases that changed American life as we knew it. Read more, https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/condition-precedent-for-suspending-the-sentence/, Madras High Court has held that the presumption of innocence is a human right and in this case, when two Courts have acquitted the accused, the said presumption should not be easily dislodged and re-trial cannot be ordered. SC on Condonation of Delay: Ultimate consideration should be to render Read more, https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/personal-knowledge-of-attorney/. : Anil Ambani and the reliance companies held guilty of contempt for defaulting payment to its creditor, Ericsson as per the previous undertaking is given to the Court. Different laws have different period of limitation for filing proceedings. The Supreme court allowed the petitioner to visit the detenu however, the judgment passed was highly criticized as the bench did not question the grounds on which detention was placed by the Central Government. Read morehttps://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/discharge-of-accused/, 17- High Court to examine the issue: Can the defence of non-CTS cheque be sustained? of the Finance Act, 2017 and whether the Act comes under the definition of Money Bill as defined under Article 110 of the Constitution of India. Drinking liquor in private vehicle, an offence under prohibition laws in Bihar. Condonation of Delay - Delay of more than 10 years allowed : Consumption of liquor in a private vehicle in a public space, comes under the definition of public space, according to the Bihar Excise Act, 2016. Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court v Subhash Chandra Agarwal, Aadhar Card Judgment referred to a larger bench and Section 184 of Finance Act upheld, The Supreme Court delivered its judgment on the constitutional validity of. Read more, https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/blocked-account-in-cheque-bounce-cases/. : Founder of famous restaurant Sarvana Bhavan, P Rajagopal and five others sentenced with life imprisonment for the murder of his ex-employee. The bench headed by Justice RF Nariman held that even at the post cognizance stage a Magistrate can invoke his powers under Section 156(3) of CrPC. Later, another application was filed seeking condonation of delay in filing of the petition. Read more, https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/accused-has-to-explain-as-to-how-his-cheque-entered-into-the-hands-of-the-complainant/. Unless there is delivery of cheque, no liability could be fastened on the drawer. After the deal was signed multiple litigants filed petitions in the Supreme Court claiming that the deal made by Mr. Modi was not according to the established procedure. (Case name: Vinubhai Haribhai Malaviya and others v The State of Gujarat and others, decided on 16.10.2019). This implies that the CJI is to be transparent and is answerable to all questions raised by the citizens of the County. Recent Arbitration Judgments Involving Construction Disputes Thereafter a writ petition was filed challenging the validity of the said order and the petitioners argued that the order passed by the Central Government was violative of, of Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act and the Supreme Court guidelines issued in. Thus, in view of the above position, the delay in filing the present Contempt Petition is condoned. The case was finally concluded by the Supreme Court after 134 years from the first case filed on this matter. Read more..https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/the-magistrate-passed-order-not-printed-proforma/, 31-Madras High Court : Form 32 being a document of sterling nature can be relied upon for quashing the case (29 September 2019), Madras High Court has observed that Form 32 is sterling in nature and therefore that can be relied upon by the court at the time of dealing with quash petition. read more, https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/subsequent-addition-of-company-as-accused/, The Chhattisgarh High Court has observed that since the loan amount was within the capacity of the complainant who was getting regular salary, judgments on source of income would not apply. Read more, https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/amendment-in-jurisdiction-provision-is-a-valid-legislation, the society played a role only to facilitate its members in getting their houses constructed and the society had no liability as per Section 138 NI Act on the date of signing of the MOU. The Supreme Court of India The Supreme Court of India is the highest Constitutional court of the Country which can be accessed directly by a citizen under Article 32 of the Constitution for redress of fundamental rights. Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that if demand notice sent by registered post is returned with a clear note that the addressee does not reside on the given address, it cannot be treated as 'served'. Read more.. https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/wife-blames-husband-for-forging-the-cheque/. (Case name: BK Pavitra and others v Union of India, decided on 10.05.2019). The Court also highlighted that the issue of whether a ban of entry of women comes under essential practice or is an integral part of the religion is to be considered. These petitions have been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 22.11.2013, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh dismissing the Civil Misc. Pleas related to nationwide protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2019, which aims to provide citizenship to persecuted minorities of Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan, also engaged. The Court declared the ban as unconstitutional and held that women of all age groups would be granted the right to enter the temple. The Court also highlighted that the issue of whether a ban of entry of women comes under essential practice or is an integral part of the religion is to be considered. (PDF) Landmark Judgments of Supreme Court - Academia.edu The Supreme Court also gave the verdict on momentous cases like Ayodhya- Babri Masjid dispute, Sabarimala case and Section 87 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The Section states that the Court may order the drawer to deposit at least 20% of the compensation or relief awarded by the Trial Court, within 60 days from the date of the order passed. Hence, in the present matter, appellant's submission that he got the knowledge of the impugned order on 31-01-2017 was nothing but an attempt to mislead the Court. The table below illustrates which opinion was filed by each justice in each case and which justices joined each opinion. Article 370 reference to larger Bench denied. Moreover, the petitioner was permitted to only meet his leader and was not allowed to carry out any other political activities. : In response to the habeas corpus petition filed by the general secretary of the Communist Party of India, the Supreme Court allowed him to visit the detenu. | Powered by, Participants from more than 85 countries have attended our Section 12A of the code prescribed threshold of 90% of the Committee of Creditors for allowing withdrawal of resolution application. On 19th April 2019, an ex-staff of the Supreme Court alleged that she was sexually harassed by the former Chief Justice of India, Mr. Ranjan Gogoi who denied all the allegations made against him. 2- High Court : If accused does not deny in the reply notice, delivery of cheque may be presumed (26 December 2019). 2019 landmark supreme court judgment on condonation of delay is the basis of this application. Follow us onInstagramand subscribe to ourYouTubechannel for more amazing legal content. United States courts of appeals may also make such decisions, particularly if the Supreme Court chooses not to review the case or if it adopts the holding of the lower court, such as in Smith v. Collin. https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/trial-court-has-to-dispose-the-case-within-6-months/, 13- Bombay High Court: Non production of original demand notice became fatal (19 October 2019), Bombay High Court refused to interfere in the acquittal of a person accused of cheque bounce when it found that the complainant did not produce the original demand notice and acknowledgment card. However, the Court upheld the legal validity of Section 184 of the Finance Act, 2017. Read morehttps://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/complainant-fills-date-in-cheque-but-accused-cannot-get-the-case-quashed/, 41- High Court: It is unimaginable that an employee would advance loan of a huge amount of Rs.39.00 lacs to his master (09 September 2019), Madhya Pradesh High Court has observed that it is unimaginable that an employee would advance a huge amount of Rs.39.00 lacs to his master and that too without executing any document of loan agreement. Read more..https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/appeal-by-legal-heirs-of-a-convict-is-permissible-in-law/, 34-Calcutta High Court : Part payment made by an accused can be taken into consideration at the time of imposing a sentence but same cannot wash away the offence(22 September 2019), Calcutta High Court has held that part payment may be taken into consideration at that time of imposing a sentence, if any. Indibility Creative Pvt Ltd and others v Government of West Bengal and others, CJI of India accused in a sexual harassment case. read morehttps://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/subsequent-addition-of-company-as-accused/, 59-High Court : For loan of small amount complainant is not required to explain the source of income (23 July 2019), The Chhattisgarh High Court has observed that since the loan amount was within the capacity of the complainant who was getting regular salary, judgments on source of income would not apply. PDF Civil Appeal Nos.949699 Of 2019 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA It also included a heavy penalty for misleading ads (ten lakh for the first offence and up to . Read more.. https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/the-magistrate-passed-order-not-printed-proforma/. High Court : If accused does not deny in the reply notice, delivery of cheque may be presumed (26 December 2019). Read more, https://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/cheque-amount-is-more-than-the-liability/, Madras High Court has reversed the acquittal and convicted a person accused of cheque bounce when it found that accused has not even given any satisfactory explanation as to how, the cheque executed and signed by him, came into the hands of the complainant. Swiss Ribbons Pvt Ltd anr v Union of India, Reliance Companies held guilty of contempt. Read morehttps://www.latestlaws.com/latest-news/unimaginable-that-an-employee-would-advance-a-huge-amount-of-rs-39-00-lacs-to-his-master/, 42-High Court : Complainant cannot file revision petition against acquittal of accused(09 September 2019), Madhya Pradesh High Court has opined that a revision petition filed by a complainant against acquittal of accused in a cheque bounce case is not maintainable.